»ó»óÀû °æÇÕ ßÌßÀîÜ ÌæùêÀº 1°³ÀÇ ÇàÀ§°¡ ¼ö°³ÀÇ ÁË¿¡ ÇØ´çÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì¸¦ ¸»ÇÑ´Ù.
Crimes of conceptual concurrence is a case where one act corresponds to several sins.
1°³ÀÇ ÆøźÀ¸·Î ¼öÀÎ ÞüìÑÀ» »ìÇØÇÑ °æ¿ì°¡ ±× ¿¹ÀÌ´Ù.
An example is the murder of many persons with a single bomb.
»ó»óÀû °æÇÕÀº ¼öÁË°£ÀÇ ÁøÁ¤ÇÑ °æÇÕÀ̶ó´Â Á¡¿¡¼ ¿Ü°ü»óÀÇ °æÇÕÀÎ ¹ýÁ¶°æÇÕ ÛöðÉÌæùê°ú ±¸º°µÈ´Ù.
Imaginary contention is distinguished from legal contention, which is an apparent contention, in that it is a true contention between condemnation.
ÇàÀ§°¡ 1°³ÀÎ Á¡¿¡¼ ÇàÀ§°¡ ¼ö°³ÀÎ ½ÇüÀû °æÇÕ ãùô÷îÜ Ìæùê°úµµ ±¸º°µÈ´Ù.
It is also distinguished from the actual contention of several actions in that there is one action.
Áï »ó»óÀû °æÇÕÀÌ ¼º¸³Çϱâ À§ÇÑ ¿ä°ÇÀ¸·Î´Â ÇàÀ§°¡ ´ÜÀÏ Ó¤ìéÇÏ°í µ¿ÀÏÇÏ´Ù.
In other words, as a requirement for imaginative contention to be established, behavior is single and identical.
ÀÌ·Î ÀÎÇØ ¼ö°³ÀÇ ±¸¼º¿ä°Ç Ï°à÷é©ËìÀ» ¼º¸³½ÃÄÑ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù.
Due to this, several configuration requirements must be established.
Çü¹ý Á¦40Á¶´Â »ó»óÀû °æÇÕ ßÌßÀîÜ ÌæùêÀÇ ±ÔÁ¤ÀÌ´Ù.
Article 40 of criminal act provides Compound Crimes.
ÀÌ Á¶Ç×Àº “1°³ÀÇ ÇàÀ§°¡ ¼ö°³ÀÇ ÁË¿¡ ÇØ´çÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì¿¡´Â °¡Àå Áß ñìÇÑ ÁË¿¡ Á¤ÇÑ ÇüÀ¸·Î ó¹úÇÑ´Ù.”°í ±ÔÁ¤ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù.
This article provides “When a single act constitutes several crimes, punishment provided for the most severe crime shall be imposed.” |