»ó¹ý Á¦360Á¶ Á¦1Ç×Àº “ÁÖ±ÇÀº °ø½ÃÃÖ°íÀÇ ÀýÂ÷¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© À̸¦ ¹«È¿·Î ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.”¶ó°í Á¤ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù.
Article 360 (1) of the Commercial Act stipulates that "the right of stock may invalidate it through a public notification procedure."
°°Àº Á¶ Á¦2Ç×Àº “ÁÖ±ÇÀ» »ó½ÇÇÑ ÀÚ´Â Á¦±ÇÆÇ°áÀ» ¾òÁö ¾Æ´ÏÇϸé ȸ»ç¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ÁÖ±ÇÀÇ Àç¹ßÇàÀ» û±¸ÇÏÁö ¸øÇÑ´Ù.”¶ó°í Á¤ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù.
Paragraph 2 of the same article stipulates that "a person who has lost the right of stock shall not request a reissue of the right of stock from the company unless a nullification judgment is obtained."
ÀÌ´Â ÁÖ±ÇÀº ÁÖ½ÄÀ» ǥâÇÏ´Â À¯°¡Áõ±ÇÀ̹ǷΠ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ÁÖ±ÇÀ» ¹«È¿·Î ÇÏÁö ¾Æ´ÏÇÏ°í´Â µ¿ÀÏÇÑ ÁÖ½ÄÀ» ǥâÇÏ´Â ´Ù¸¥ ÁÖ±ÇÀ» ¹ßÇàÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø´Ù´Â ÀǹÌÀÌ´Ù.
This means that since stock certificates are securities that show stocks, other stock certificates that show the same stock cannot be issued without invalidating the existing stock certificates.
À§ ±ÔÁ¤¿¡ ¹ÝÇÏ¿© Á¦±ÇÆÇ°á ¾øÀÌ Àç¹ßÇàµÈ ÁÖ±ÇÀº È¿·ÂÀÌ ¾ø´Ù°í º» °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
Contrary to the above provisions, the right of stock reissued without nullification judgment was considered to be ineffective.
ÆÇ·Ê´Â Áõ±ÇÀ̳ª Áõ¼ÀÇ ¹«È¿¸¦ ¼±°íÇÑ Á¦±ÇÆÇ°áÀÇ È¿·ÂÀº °ø½ÃÃÖ°í ½ÅûÀο¡°Ô ±× Áõ±Ç ¶Ç´Â Áõ¼¸¦ ¼ÒÁöÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â °Í°ú µ¿ÀÏÇÑ ÁöÀ§¸¦ ȸº¹½ÃÅ°´Â °Í¿¡ ±×Ä£´Ù°í ÆǽÃÇß´Ù.
The precedent rule concluded that the validity of a nullification jurisdiction over which the securities or certificates were invalidated would be limited to restoring the same status to the applicant for the public notification.
°ø½ÃÃÖ°í ½ÅûÀÎÀÌ ½ÇÁúÀûÀÎ ±Ç¸®ÀÚÀÓÀ» È®Á¤ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀº ¾Æ´Ï¶ó´Â ¶æÀÌ´Ù.
This means that it does not confirm that the applicant for the public notification is the actual right holder.
|