The legal act of a “person with disabilities in intention” is invalid.
‘Àǻ繫´É·ÂÀÚ’ÀÇ ¹ý·üÇàÀ§´Â ¹«È¿ÀÌ´Ù.
A “person with disabilities in intention” is “a person who does not have the mental
ability or intelligence to reasonably judge the meaning or result of one's actions
with normal awareness and anticipation.”
‘Àǻ繫´É·ÂÀÚ’´Â, “ÀÚ±âÀÇ ÇàÀ§ÀÇ Àǹ̳ª °á°ú¸¦ Á¤»óÀûÀÎ Àνİú ¿¹±â·ÂÀ¸·Î ÇÕ¸®ÀûÀ¸·Î
ÆÇ´ÜÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Á¤½ÅÀû ´É·Â ³»Áö´Â Áö´ÉÀ» °¡Áö°í ÀÖÁö ¸øÇÑ °æ¿ì”ÀÌ´Ù.
The reason for simply having dementia or being admitted to a psychiatric hospital can
be considered as an active factor in determining whether a person is incompetent
in intention.
´Ü¼øÈ÷ Ä¡¸Å¶ó°Å³ª, Á¤½Åº´¿ø¿¡ ÀÔ¿ø ÁßÀ̶ó´Â »çÀ¯´Â ÀÇ»ç ¹«´É·ÂÀÚ ¿©ºÎÀÇ ÆÇ´Ü¿¡
Àû±ØÀûÀÎ ¿ä¼Ò·Î °í·ÁµÉ ¼ö´Â ÀÖ´Ù.
However, the incapacitated person in intention is determined whether or not it
is applicable individually and in detail as of the time of signing the contract.
±×·¯³ª Àǻ繫´É·ÂÀÚ´Â °è¾àü°á ´ç½Ã¸¦ ±âÁØÀ¸·Î, °³º°Àû ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀ¸·Î ±× ÇØ´ç ¿©ºÎ¸¦
ÆÇ´ÜÇÑ´Ù.
On the other hand, if there is significant unfairness in the contents of the contract, it is
an unfair legal act and may be invalidated in accordance with Article 104 of the Civil Code.
ÇÑÆí, °è¾àÀÇ ³»¿ë¿¡ ÇöÀúÇÑ ºÒ°øÁ¤¼ºÀÌ ÀÖ´Â °æ¿ì, ºÒ°øÁ¤ÇÑ ¹ý·üÇàÀ§·Î½á, ¹Î¹ý 104Á¶¿¡
µû¶ó ¹«È¿·Î µÉ °¡´É¼ºÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù.
In this case, objective circumstances such as buying at a significantly higher
price compared to the objective market price of the target object or selling at
a significantly lower price must be proved.
ÀÌ °æ¿ì, ¸ñÀû¹°ÀÇ °´°üÀûÀÎ ½Ã°¡¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© ÇöÀúÈ÷ ºñ½Î°Ô ¸Å¼öÇϰųª, ÇöÀúÈ÷ ½Ñ °¡°Ý¿¡
¸ÅµµÇÏ´Â µîÀÇ °´°üÀûÀÎ »çÁ¤ÀÌ ÀÔÁõµÇ¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù.
It should also be reviewed that it should be proved that the other party had a
willingness to actively use impatience, carelessness, and inexperience.
»ó´ë¹æÀÌ ±Ã¹Ú, °æ¼Ö, ¹«°æÇèÀ» Àû±ØÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ·Á´Â Àǻ簡 ÀÖ¾ú´Ù´Â Á¡ÀÌ ÀÔÁõµÇ¾î¾ß
ÇÑ´Ù´Â Á¡ ¶ÇÇÑ °ËÅäµÇ¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. |