In the institutional approach, the lack of administrative control mechanisms is a major cause of corruption in public officials.
Á¦µµÀû Á¢±Ù¹ý¿¡¼ ÇàÁ¤ÅëÁ¦ ÀåÄ¡ÀÇ ¹Ìºñ´Â °ø¹«¿ø ºÎÆÐÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ¿øÀÎÀÌ´Ù.
In other words, it is a lack of law and system.
Áï ¹ý°ú Á¦µµÀÇ ¹ÌºñÀÌ´Ù.
The socio-cultural approach explains the causes of corruption in public office with various factors such as customs, empirical habits, and corruption incentives.
»çȸ¹®ÈÀû Á¢±Ù¹ýÀº °øÁ÷ºÎÆÐÀÇ ¿øÀο¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© °ü½À, °æÇèÀû ½À¼º, ºÎÆÐÀ¯ÀÎÀÚ µî ´Ù¾çÇÑ ¿äÀÎÀ¸·Î ¼³¸íÇÑ´Ù.
The regimental approach has complex factors.
üÁ¦·ÐÀû Á¢±Ù¹ýÀº º¹ÇÕ¿äÀÎÀ» µç´Ù.
The moral approach sees individual principles and qualities as the cause.
µµ´öÀû Á¢±ÙÀº °³Àοø¸®, ÀÚÁúÀ» ¿øÀÎÀ¸·Î º»´Ù.
White corruption is good-willed corruption without serious harm to society or intention for private interest.
¹é»öºÎÆд »çȸ¿¡ ½É°¢ÇÑ ÇØ°¡ ¾ø°Å³ª »çÀÍÀ» Ãß±¸ÇÏ·Á´Â ±âµµ°¡ ¾ø´Â ¼±ÀÇÀÇ ºÎÆÐÀÌ´Ù.
On the other hand, black corruption is corruption that causes obvious and serious harm to the social system, and it is a corruption that all members recognize and want punishment.
ÀÌ¿¡ ¹ÝÇØ Èæ»öºÎÆд »çȸüÁ¦¿¡ ¸í¹éÇÏ°í ½É°¢ÇÑ Çظ¦ ³¢Ä¡´Â ºÎÆзΠ±¸¼º¿ø ¸ðµÎ°¡ ÀÎÁ¤ÇÏ°í ó¹úÀ» ¿øÇÏ´Â ºÎÆÐÀÌ´Ù.
In addition, gray corruption is corruption that has the potential to have a destructive effect on the social system.
¾Æ¿ï·¯ ȸ»öºÎÆд »çȸüÁ¦¿¡ Æı«ÀûÀÎ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¥ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÀáÀ缺À» Áö´Ñ ºÎÆÐÀÌ´Ù.
Along with this, transactional corruption is bribery and rewarding.
ÀÌ¿Í ÇÔ²² °Å·¡Çü ºÎÆд ³ú¹°À» ¹Þ°í ÇýÅÃÀ» ºÎ¿©ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
Also, fraudulent corruption refers to public money embezzlement and accounting corruption.
¶ÇÇÑ »ç±âÇü ºÎÆд °ø±ÝȾ·É, ȸ°èºÎÁ¤À» ¸»ÇÑ´Ù.
|